Search This Blog

Monday, January 31, 2011

Shame on CBS...Super Bowl Ads Stink of Agenda

This year, the Super Bowl WAS better than the commercials (recapped here). Much better.

The advertising winner was easily the 2nd one to broadc
ast after kickoff: The Betty White Snickers commercial.

Then there were a bunch of nearly literate commercials in which down-trodden thirty-somethings disclose the ugly truth of ealry adulthood. Like guy has baby and realizes he will never have a cool car. Guy has wife and realizes he will never again chase a hot girl. Guy has house and car and wife and baby...and cut to guy hanging from nearby oak tree. You get the point, right?


Isn't enough that Madison Avenue ad agency executives are sipping martinis and quipping about "skirts" during the working hours? Do they have to rub Joe Middle Class' misery into our own, weary faces? All of these commercials, designed to seel soap or cars or candy, are just lovely reminders that most of us (and by us I mean me and, most likely, if you are still reading a blog post from a state college writing professor, you) will spend our lives working too hard for too little. But why?

I don't want to be reminded of such things while I am doing the one thing I actually dream about all week...watching football! Yet, most ads this year seemed to say, "Welcome to the Super Bowl, American men, we hope you enjoy feeling crappy about your lives!"

The rest...even the funny or racy ones, left me flat, bewildered, and....shocker!...kind of angry!

GoDaddy.com, a web domain broker, for some strange reason, elicits Racecar Superbabe Danica Patrick (left) as the centerpiece of scandalous commercials in which eye-candy blondes ultimately rip open their shirts. Seems like a less-than-stellar example of neanderthal marketing? It is, but the GoDaddy commercials evince one of the key differences among networks who broadcast the big game.

Last year, when the Bowl was telecast on Fox, the GoDaddy girls wore string bikinis when the clothes predicatbly popped off. On CBS, this year, they wore modest tank tops. The GoDaddy girls were better covered than Reggie Wayne in the 4th Quarter. I've seen Mormon weddings with more skin. Why? Half-time show '04. Remember Janet, my first name ain't baby, it's Wardrobe Malfunction, Boobie slip if you're nasty? There's your reason. CBS is under the microscope from the Conservative Right, and viola. Beer commercials your grandmother can feel good about.

This, of course, sets up my indictment of CBS. Be ultra-careful with nudity...no problem. I don't mind de-sexing sports. The NFL should maintain a decorum of family viewership. Still, I don't believe CBS' intent was simply protective of American families.

The network flexed its conservative muscle when it green-lit an anti-abortion commercial starring Heisman Winner Tim Tebow and his mom. The message was clear. The organization was clear. Pro-Life. So, take heart and heed all of you suffering inner-city welfare moms and rape victims: your child might also one day grow up to cry after losing the SEC Championship game (left). 

Fine. Again, no problem. Broadcast Pro-Life propaganda without a Pro-Choice rebuttal. What makes this unacceptable is the fact that CBS execs stopped a commercial in which two men touch hands inside a bowl of potato chips. Too racy. Really? For whom? Homophobes in neckwear. The debate over gay acceptance and equal rights is too much for the Super Bowl, but taking a side on abortion is not? Unacceptable. 

It doesn't take Jessica Fletcher or Father Dowling to see what's happening here. CBS used the largest stage in the land to set a creepy conservative agenda, and I hope that this message is touted for more than my five readers, and thank you, again, all five of you. Shame on you, CBS!

7 comments:

  1. Im gonna agree with you on this one. However the Doritos commercial was by far the best and funniest commercial out of all of them. Pete

    ReplyDelete
  2. I agree with you on the whole "We can air biased abortion commercials but not 'racy' commercials concerning homosexuality." It's really stupid. I'm pro-choice, and I think if they're allowed to air a pro-life commercial, they should definitely air a pro-choice one.

    And your style of writing reminds me of Cracked.com. It makes me laugh.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Stockton had no cable therefore I could not even watch the Superbowl but I also agree with Raechel. I think that its pretty awful that they cannot even play a commercial with two men touching hands. Like really ? There is much out there. We'll at least you were all lucky to watch the Superbowl !

    ReplyDelete
  4. ProChoice was supposed to be airing a commercial to counteract the other one, but they didn't. Prochoice was the reason why pro-life came out with a commerical. I think it is good to see both sides considering there are different opions. Plus I am tired of seeing Plan B commerecials telling everyone it is okay to have sex as long as you are 17 and can buy the pill. Anyway, the best commercials were the baby ones, and Brett Farve mocking himself about retiring. Either way Colts lost and Payton Manning can cry for a real reason now (not just because Mark Sanchez is better looking haha).

    ReplyDelete
  5. I agree that bias is uncalled for (especially on Super Sunday), but in the end it all comes down to the dollars and cents. Focus on the Family funded the ad and as far as cbs is concerned, if you have three million on Super sunday than you can buy yourself thirty seconds. CBS did it for the money and because Tebow was one of the greats of college football. Check out this commercial from 2007, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EjuXbYW6KmE , and tell me what is racy. CBS is in it for the money. The puxatony polamalu ad was the best.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Glad to see my face made it on the blog. LOL

    ReplyDelete
  7. Well said, Joe...and following your link forced me to make acquaintance with Trale Lewous...wow.

    ReplyDelete